Sources of law
In explaining the sources of English law, it has to be borne
in mind that the law has evolved organically over many centuries.
Prior to 1189 England had a codified, civil legal system
that was based on Roman law, which is still the basis of law in most of Europe.
After 1189 the laws passed by the crown gradually replaced the laws and customs
of the various local courts. This was the beginning of the common law in
England.
The term “common law” has three meanings; two are used in
this essay. The first separates civil law from English law. The second
separates case law from legislative law – Parliamentary statute.
Case law had been applied in English courts long before
legislation was introduced. It is based upon judges using their common sense to
apply the legal rules and customs in a fair and consistent manner. Judgments
are made using the principle of precedent (stare
decisis), meaning that a court is bound by the decisions of an equal or
higher court in a case of equivalent circumstances
Since Norman times the monarch and then parliament made
legislation. The Magna Carta, imposed on King John by the feudal barons at
Runnymede in 1215, was the first document to limit the power of the crown by
law. The oldest extant legislation (Distress
Act 1267 C.4 Statute of Marlborough 52 Hen 3) narrowly post dates this
event.
Today, legislation is created by and enacted under the
auspices of Parliament. The functions of legislation are basically making,
changing and repealing the law. This is significantly different to case law.
Judges are not meant to make law; they are able, through the use of the rules
of construction, the rules of language and the other aids to interpretation, to
shape the law to meet Parliament’s intent. Central to the legislative process
is debate. Bills can initially be presented to either the House of Common’s or
the House of Lord’s as a matter of government policy or agenda, or without
government backing as a private member’s Bill. Through a process of discussion,
consultation, revision and voting the Bill may become law.
Unless otherwise stated in the Act, the Act becomes law on
the date it receives Royal Assent. Alternatively, it may have a commencement
date or the Act may delegate authority to a Minister or local government body
to initiate the Act. The scope of the secondary legislation is stipulated in
the Act; to act outside of those provisions would be ultra vires.
The European
Communities Act 1972 was enacted to allow EU law to be incorporated into
domestic law without the repeated intervention of parliament. The primary
legislation of the EU is contained in the two treaties that were amended by the
Treaty of Lisbon, which came into force on 1st December 2009 viz.
The Treaty on European Union (Maastricht) and the former Treaty of Rome – now
known as The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. This legislation
is binding on all member states and institutions.
Secondary legislation, mainly regulations and directives, is
enacted by the EU institutions: The Council of the European Union; The European
Commission and The European Parliament.
Somewhat ironically, case law judgments of the Court of
Justice of the European Union (CJEU) are binding on UK courts, but not on the
CJEU itself because it does not have a concept of stare decisis. In reality the CJEU only departs from its previous
decisions for compelling reason. This is somewhat analogous to the Supreme
Court and its use of The Practice
Statement [1966] 3 All ER 77.
Decisions in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) are
not binding on UK law, but are considered persuasive. In the judgment of ECHR in A v. United Kingdom (Application
No 3455/05) per Lord Hoffman “To reject such a decision would almost
certainly put this country in breach of the international obligation which it
accepted when it acceded to the convention”.
Legislation is the most important source of English law. The
law reflects the morals and customs of the society it serves. Domestic
legislation is best placed of all the sources discussed to meet this end.
Case law, through the interpretation of statute is more
malleable on a work-a-day basis, but it lacks the authority of democracy, and
is subject to the prejudices of individual judges.
Although UK law, in many areas is subordinate to EU
legislation and ECHR judgments, as has been shown, none the less, this is a
direct result of UK legislation in the form or The European Communities Act 1972.
VJ (C) 2012
VJ (C) 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment